Callahan Signs Letter to Obama Urging Action on Guns

Bethlehem Mayor John Callahan signs letter from more than 750 mayors urging president to take immediate steps to stop gun violence in wake of Connecticut shootings.


Mayor John Callahan is one of more than 750 mayors nationwide who signed a letter to President Barack Obama urging him to take immediate action to curb gun violence in the wake of the shooting deaths of 20 children and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., Friday.

The letter, dated Wednesday from an organization calling itself Mayors Against Illegal Guns, urges the president to pursue a new legislative agenda and take immediate steps to curb gun violence.

Among the actions urged are a new assault weapons ban, the closing of private sale loopholes that circumvent criminal background checks on gun purchases and a recess appointment of a new director for the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives.

Do you agree with the letter? Tell us in the comments.

The mayors of the Lehigh Valley’s three largest cities – Callahan, Ed Pawlowski of Allentown and Sal Panto of Easton – all signed the letter. But so did the mayors of 11 other smaller Lehigh Valley boroughs and townships.

They are:

Donald L. Wunderler of Bath; Barbara A. Schlegel of Catasauqua; Winfield Iobst of Emmaus; Gerald C. Yob of Freemansburg; Thomas Reenock of Northampton; Desiree D. DeNicola of Roseto; Sherman Metzgar of Stockertown; Luke Duignam of Tatamy; Gerald W. Gross of West Easton; Edward D. Hozza, Jr. of Whitehall Township, and David Perruso of Wilson:

Here is the text of the letter, in its entirety:

Dear President Obama,

On Friday, December 14th the entire nation watched as parents stood outside the Sandy Hook Elementary School and waited, desperately hoping to be reunited with their children.  That moment will never end for the families of the 20 children and six adults who were murdered that day at the school. 

As mayors, we are charged with keeping our communities safe.  But too many of us have sat with mothers and fathers of children killed with guns. Twenty-four children enrolled in public schools in your hometown of Chicago were shot to death just last year. 

At the moving memorial service on Sunday evening, you said: “If there is even one step we can take to save another child or another parent or another town from the grief that has visited Tucson and Aurora and Oak Creek and Newtown and communities from Columbine to Blacksburg before that – then surely we have an obligation to try.”

Our bipartisan coalition of more than 750 mayors has joined forces with over 700,000 Americans and more than 100 survivors of deadly shootings, including the mass shootings you mentioned in your remarks. Together, we urge you to put forward an agenda that is rooted in common sense and that will make it harder for dangerous people to possess guns, and easier for police and prosecutors to crack down on them.  That agenda should:

  • Require every gun buyer to pass a criminal background check:  Background checks are the only systematic way to stop felons, domestic abusers and other dangerous people from buying firearms.  These checks are instantaneous and highly effective. Since its inception, the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) has blocked firearms purchases at licensed dealerships by millions of individuals who are barred by federal law from owning them.  But criminals and other prohibited purchasers avoid these checks by buying firearms, including online and at gun shows, from unlicensed “private sellers” who are not required by federal law to conduct the checks. Millions of gun sales — estimated at more than 40 percent of the U.S. annual total — are conducted through private sellers. The Fix Gun Checks Act (H.R.1781 / S.436) would close this enormous gap in our laws by requiring a criminal background check for every gun sale. 
  • Get high capacity rifles and ammunition magazines off our streets: Military-style weapons and high capacity ammunition magazines have no appropriate civilian or sporting function. They are designed to kill large numbers of people quickly. They are also disproportionately used to kill law enforcement officers; approximately one out of five law enforcement officers slain in the line of duty is killed with assault weapons. The time has come to review the federal assault weapons ban that expired in 2004 and draft a new law that is clear and enforceable and will take these weapons out of our communities.
  • Make gun trafficking a federal crime: Today, there is no clear and effective statute making gun trafficking a crime. Prosecutors are instead forced to rely on a weak law prohibiting engaging in the business of selling guns without a federal license, which carries the same punishment as trafficking chicken or livestock.  As a result, according to the Justice Department’s Inspector General, U.S. Attorneys decline to prosecute 25 percent of those cases while declining only 9 percent of drug conspiracy cases. Mayors Against Illegal Guns supports proposals to empower law enforcement to investigate and prosecute straw purchasers, gun traffickers, and their entire criminal networks.

Those ideas require action by Congress, but there are steps you and your Administration could and should take immediately to curb gun violence:

  • Appoint an ATF director: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives (ATF), the federal agency responsible for enforcing our gun laws, has gone without a confirmed director for more than six years.  During that time, criminals and those with serious mental illness have been able to take advantage of insufficient enforcement of existing federal gun laws, and an estimated 72,000 Americans have been murdered with guns.  In 2011, for the first time in over a decade, more police officers were shot to death in the line of duty than were killed in automobile accidents. The need for leadership at the ATF has never been more urgent. The time has come for you to make a recess appointment to fill the vacancy at the top of the ATF.
  • Prosecute prohibited purchasers who attempt to buy firearms, ammunition or high-capacity magazines: The Justice Department should vigorously prosecute felons and other prohibited purchasers who fail gun background checks. In 2009, the Federal Bureau of Investigation referred more than 71,000 such cases to ATF, but U.S. Attorneys ultimately prosecuted only 77 of them.  Prosecuting these offenders is a goal broadly supported by our coalition and the National Rifle Association.  The Department should also develop a mechanism for sharing NICS denial information with local and state law enforcement officials by sending them active alerts; or, at a minimum, posting the information at the National Criminal Information Center so state and local law enforcement officials can access it during investigations.
  • Require federal agencies to report records to NICS: The NICS Improvement Act of 2007 requires federal agencies to submit mental health, substance abuse and other records that prohibit a person from owning a gun to NICS.  However, few agencies comply.  In October 2011, the FBI provided data to MAIG on reporting by 60 federal agencies.  Of those 60 agencies, 52 had given zero mental health records to NICS. Although total federal agency reporting of mental health records increased by ten percent between March and October 2011, to 143,579, the vast majority of those records had been submitted by one agency, the Department of Veterans Affairs.  Even fewer federal agencies are reporting drug abusers.  Only three agencies — the FBI, the U.S. Coast Guard, and the Court Services and Offenders Supervision Agency (CSOSA), the probation and parole services agency for the District of Columbia — have submitted any substance abuse records, and the vast majority of federal agencies, including the Drug Enforcement Administration, have not submitted a single substance abuse record. The president should issue an executive order requiring all federal agency heads to certify twice annually, in writing, to the U.S. Attorney General that their agency has submitted all relevant records to NICS.
  • Repeal remaining Tiahrt restrictions:  While Mayors Against Illegal Guns and our law enforcement allies have made progress in relaxing the “Tiahrt restrictions,” which are riders to the federal budget that restrict access to federal gun data, some still remain. These remaining restrictions keep the public, particularly researchers and elected officials, in the dark about gun traffickers – specifically, who they are and how they operate.  It also requires the FBI to destroy records of approved NICS background checks within 24 hours. That makes it harder to detect law-breaking dealers who fake their records, or to identify straw buyers who undergo the checks on behalf of someone who couldn’t pass. The Tiahrt Amendments also say ATF can’t require dealers to inspect their inventory, which could reduce the tens of thousands of guns that go missing or are stolen each year. Finally, the police and other law enforcement agencies that get trace data can’t use it in license revocation proceedings or in civil litigation. The administration should repeal these restrictions in its next budget.

In the past few days, the American people came together in a national outpouring of grief and sympathy for the families of victims slain in the mass shooting in Newtown. We share in that grief. But our constituents are also outraged and looking for leadership from the White House. We look forward to working with you to find a solution to gun violence in our country.

John G. Lewis December 20, 2012 at 11:41 PM
I apologize for the poor English, above... Anyway, this is an "emotional moment" for all in our country, and this is not to say we should underact, but we should not overact, either. There is the option of placing an armed guard in the schools during the day: has this been thought of/suggested? This would add, rather than take away. If funds are a problem... perhaps the (local) school could shut down one of it's sports programs, or lower the money being spent on technology & etc. *rather than* proposing people to give up their 2nd Amendment rights. Partially now, yes, but in the future who knows? An amendment, actually anything, in the Constitution, can be repealed. Two Hundred and Fifty odd years ago... it was a different time then, yes... but let us be very careful, if we ever do it, of taking something away from the Constitution. Are we really sure how they thought? Yes, there are existing letters, and scholars of such. Additionally, there is the philosophical question of what are the best laws... Yet attaining certainty in a situation such as this is very difficult. I suggest we be careful. It also is untypical for a state, once given certain powers, to then release them. This should be a serious consideration here. - J. G. Lewis '90
Rose Ann Reiss December 21, 2012 at 02:04 AM
Speaking so freely about automatically institutionalizing someone with a mental disability shows me you have no heart Mental illness is a sickness as much as cancer, heart attacks etc. It can be treated with the correct meds and/or hospitalization for a time long enough to get on the right meds. I feel sad for all the hurt in the world due to the violence by the hands and thoughts of those who have struggled, some for many years, with the voices being heard in their heads, feeling worthless or just plain being bullied all of their lives. They are human beings too and these people should have been given the opportunity to get whatever help they needed. Everyone is quick to judge instead of looking at the whole picture. Our laws have to change to allow for family members to be able to take care of their loved ones BEFORE it's too late.
Beth December 21, 2012 at 04:00 AM
Thinking that "Prozac" will help one with mental illness proves that you have no clue how debilitating mental illness can be to all of those involved. Try that statement again. And, in the meantime, do a little poll and see how many parents would feel more secure with their Kindergarten teacher having a gun on them. Do you have kids, Keith? And, a wus to me is someone who doesn't want to handle a problem they are faced with, rather, wave a gun in it's face.
John G. Lewis December 21, 2012 at 12:28 PM
R.A.R.: Yes, one of my (many) points: It is easy to make a quick, and popular, judgement before looking at the whole picture. The Bernie Getz case of the 1980's, when I was attending Lehigh, occurred in NYC. He was approached on a train or subway by a gang, and they thought: here is the typical milquetoast. And they judged incorrectly.... Don't be swept away with the impulse of a moment. It is a repeated mistake of countries, and individuals, throughout history, and can be very wrong. This is a complicated situation here. - J. G. Lewis '90
Cate Shea December 28, 2012 at 08:33 PM
So, a law against owning guns is going to stop violence against innocents? Has the law against assault, and the law against murder, stopped those things from happening?


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »