patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Willow Lane Busing Could Become Thing of Past Tonight

If the East Penn 2012-2013 district budget passes tonight in a similar form to the proposed final budget approved by the board on May 14, 2012, busing will be eliminated at Willow Lane Elementary School in Fall 2012.

 

The East Penn Board of School Directors will vote on the 2012-2013 school budget at tonight’s school board meeting.

Unless there is a significant deviation between the spending plan put before the board tonight and the proposed final budget approved by the board at its May 14 meeting, busing at Willow Lane Elementary School will officially become a thing of the past when the board approves the final budget tonight.

According to The Morning Call, when Willow Lane opened in 2010, the administration said that eventually busing would be stopped at the school.

In past school board meetings focused on the 2012-2013 spending plan, the administration reported that the district will save about $60,000 by eliminating transportation for students who live within 1.5 miles from the school. About 325 students who this year rode the bus to school will be impacted by tonight’s vote, according to the Call.

Under state law, school districts are only required to provide busing for special education students.

During this year’s budget discussion, the administration said that district-wide busing could be on the chopping block with the 2013-2014 budget cycle

Related Topics: 2012-2013 Budget, Busing, East Penn School District, and Willow Lane

Mary Hart

7:32 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

so does the school district want the kids to walk along Willow to get to school. parts of Willow are EXTREMELY dangerous! There are no sidewalks (In the area near the Willows restaurant) ya, that's the government using their heads again.

Reply
Comment_arrow

optimist

8:26 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

As I recally they are considering some kind of clause about dangerous areas for walking. I think we should all stay tuned.

Patch_comments_icon

Mariella Savidge

7:52 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

The LMT Board of Commissioners talked about this issue at its last meeting, Mary. They plan to work with the school district on this. But it will be interesting to follow this issue, for sure!

Reply

Macungie resident

8:03 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

Are they planning on having a crossing guard at willow/sauerkraut?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ron Beitler

10:59 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

They spoke about this topic briefly at last LMT BOC meeting. I was surprised these discussions are just happening now. There was a question about who pays for crossing guard. Township or EPSD.

Patch_comments_icon

Mariella Savidge

8:09 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

Very good question. We don't know yet.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michael D Siegel

10:04 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

I sent this email last week to LMT- everybody needs to get this to LMT commissioners- they work because I had them placed in Lower Providence Township in front of three schools when I was the Planning Director

Lastly, can you please investigate the possibility of the use of stalker boards for the Willow school area. This would greatly help the speeding car situation. I had the same problem in Lower Providence until I worked with the school district and had these placed at the school zones with the asphalt marked pavers at the crosswalks (like at Brandywine Subdivsion) http://www.stalkerradar.com/pdf/spboard_brochure.pdf

Robert Sentner

8:15 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

I am lost here, was stated before that EPSD transports 10,000 students per day with a 6.5 million dollar budget. that equals $650 per student, but we are going to save 60,000 dollars by not busing 325 students. Thats only $184 per student. Something doesn't add up. The whole 6.5 million dollar bus contract sounds stinky to me. Does anyone know if the contract is on line or where I could get a copy of it. Time to look at some competitive bidding. or let me guess its a union thing !!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

optimist

8:25 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

Mr. Senter:
You are asking very good questions. I have provided a link below used to get information from the district. Might I suggest you give that shot? Also, let's see what is stated tonight.
http://www.eastpennsd.org/School%20Board/

Comment_arrow

Michael D Siegel

10:10 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

Bidding is the way to go. With the state saying no bus funding as a way to tell school boards to start looking a serious funding cuts from the state, parents need to have their children walk to school. What ever happened to safety cadet programs that taught kids leadership and responsibility? - a program sorely needed for many students. I would rather pay an adult to help mentor this program than to pay to a an adult to waste gas with a half empty buss riding around

Susan Berger

8:26 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

My husband is attending the meeting armedbwith a plethora of good points. After a Kindergartner was hit last year, they can't honestly think this is a smart idea. Not to mention all of the other negatives. They are out of their minds if they think my 7-year-old is going to walk to school.

Reply
Comment_arrow

optimist

8:36 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

We all need to hope and pray that the climate at the state level starts to change or we may have no school transportation available soon. We may all be using private transportation or driving our kids to school.
http://lowermacungie.patch.com/articles/east-penn-may-look-at-cutting-student-buses-in-2013-2014

Comment_arrow

LMTnative

9:29 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

This is one of the best ideas the school district has had in years. Today's kids keep getting lazier and lazier. They want to sit on the couch and play video games. This is a win-win situation for all involved parties. The district and taxpayers will save money, the kids will get some much-needed exercise, and it will take fossil fuel burning busses off the road. It really shouldn’t matter much for Willow Lane. Most of those helicopter parents drop off and pick up their kids anyway because riding the bus is beneath them. I hope they include a closure of the parent drop off as part of this program. It’s disgusting to see all of those parents wasting time and fuel in line dropping off and picking up their little primadonas. If they eliminated parent drop off and pickup that would significantly reduce morning traffic at Willow and Sauerkraut. I just hope the board has enough balls to stand up to these parents who are perpetuating the entitlement mentality in their children.

Comment_arrow

Taxed

5:18 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

Students already walk to Jefferson and Lincoln elementary schools in Emmaus. (Both East Penn schools). Walking to Willow is not any different.

Comment_arrow

seriousthinking

9:50 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

@LMTnative...call us helicopter parents or whatever you like. Im sure you are or were one of the parents who never cared about what your child was doing or where they are. I will be one of the parents driving my kids because I am a parent who gives a damn!

Fred

9:29 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

Whatever happened to parental responsibility to get one's own kids to school without more gimmee, gimmee, gimmee's? We, as any societal group, have gotten so entitled to everything! Woe are we!

Reply

Ron Beitler

11:04 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

Provided there are clauses for un-safe stretches such as Willow Lane down into East Texas, provided that crossing guards are hired and if the township and EPSD work together to provide safe routes for walking/biking ect. ect. I have no problem with this. Remember, it was known bussing would eventually be stopped when the school was built.

Reply

Rob Hamill

11:48 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

This school district is not run for the benefit of the kids,... it is run to employ teacher union members and administrators just long enough so that they can retire at age 55 and have a free ride for the next 35 years on the backs of us and our children. Don't bother them with petty kid things.

Reply
Comment_arrow

optimist

12:02 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

spoken by a true expert of hatred, lies and petiness

Comment_arrow

Sheriffchris

2:01 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

Rob, I'm afraid you are absolutely correct. With just about 65% of the school budget going to Salaries and Benefits...does not leave much else.

Comment_arrow

truth seeker

2:34 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

Good to see you folks are beating up on teachers again. That's at least a better argument than claiming the district could have a big tax giveback with no future consequences. If I need a loan soon I'll go find a teacher since they are so wealthy.

Comment_arrow

Al Bundy

7:16 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Thanks Rob, You just did so much for the kids when you were on the school board.

Rob Hamill

12:08 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

When one speaks the truth, there is no need for monikers that the union members use to hide their identities.

Reply
Comment_arrow

optimist

12:39 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

oh I see. Who was SoraingEagle??? Call me Jimmy Hoffa if you want. I could care less.

Christine Butz

5:38 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

What about students that attend that school and have to cross Lower Macungie Road and walk down Willow Lane? That is really an unsafe walk for them!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ron Beitler

6:36 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

Christine, I think this area is out of the radius that would be required to walk. It's only the immediate neighborhoods adjacent to the school.

Comment_arrow

Susan Berger

9:21 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

This is for children living 1.5 miles from the school with the "ability" to walk (ie, sidewalks). Anyone up Mill Creek Spur and Willow (going towards East Texas) would not be affected. But it IS affecting about 65% of the students. We live 1.3 miles from school, and while there are sidewalks, my son is NOT walking. Let us not forget that there are NO sidewalks on school property until you reach the front door. So, these children are supposed to walk in the midst of oncoming and outgoing traffic due another stupid development mistake they made.

Susan Berger

9:13 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

Doesn't everyone realize that these children are NOT going to be walking to school. I would consider it child abuse to make a 5-year-old walk 45 minutes to and from school each day...especially alone. The intersections at Mill Creek and Willow are so dangerous that a 5-year-old, walking WITH two adults, was hit by a car last year. And it wasn't even with an abundance of vehicles on the road. And whoever said this will REDUCE pollution is wrong. It will do the exact opposite when 300 parents are driving their kids to school. And no one in their right mind will let a child walk to school in extreme temperatures and conditions. This is an ELEMENTARY school. Not a middle school or a high school. Lincoln and Jefferson may walk, but that's becuase there are safer roads for them to travel. You'll notice Shoemaker and Wescosville do not walk. Why? Because Rt. 100 and Brookside Rd. are just as dangerous as Sauerkraut. I also don't remember them ever conducting a traffic study or placing school zone signs/flashing lights anywhere near the school. They're getting a $200,000 grant from the state and they still want to cut busing to save a lousy $60k. Please! Their first lawsuit is going to cost 5 times that amount.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Taxed

10:55 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

The roads in Emmaus are no safer for the students walking to school than walking to Willow. In Emmaus the cars are parked in the street,making visibility poor, there are also railroad tracks. And last year a high school student was hit walking to school. The fact remains is that the district is not required to provide transportation except to special education students. Just face it Susan, you will be driving to school. I agree with you , I would not let my children walk to school either. But I doubt you can sue the district for something they are not required to provide. Maybe the district should take transportation out of the budget altogether. Have parents pay if they want their child to ride a bus like they do in the cities. Then every parent would have the option of a bus for their child. And only parents of children riding the bus will be paying for it. Now we all pay for the bus for other peoples' children to ride.

Comment_arrow

Lower Mac Resident

8:13 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

I agree with Taxed, make it a separate fee...you want your kid on the bus, you pay to put your kid on the bus...I don't mind dropping mine off at school

Comment_arrow

tamarya

9:38 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

I think they should charge swain students to use east penns buses too. If the public school is not good enough for your child then pay the busing too, seems no one brought the private schools up, however the ones that pay the taxes for the district they use should pay extra.

Linda Miller

9:22 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

As a property owner and senior citizen, I feel that ALL households with children, whether you rent or own, should pay a specific amount for each child who attends public school. This fee could be used toward bussing. There are a lot of families with children who rent in the EPSD who never have to contribute to the school district in any way. Seems unfair.

Reply

Ron Beitler

9:57 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Recent effort at property tax reform failed to get out of committee... "Another effort at property tax reform has come to an end, at least for this year. The House Finance Committee voted 13-11 to table House Bill 1776, or the Property Tax Independence Act, which citizen activists and some legislators had hoped would provide the property tax relief that has been sought by many area residents for as long as three decades."

We need to reform the system. Contact your state Rep. Let him know you want property tax reform addressed.

Reply

Leave a comment