patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Willow Lane Bus Issue Advances

Motion to take $60,000 from the budgetary fund reserve to pay for buses for Willow Lane is tabled until the Aug. 13 meeting of the East Penn Board of School Directors.

 

The East Penn Board of School Directors voted 5-3 last night to table a motion to use $60,000 from the budgetary reserve fund to reinstate busing for students who live within 1.5 miles of Willow Lane Elementary School.

The motion, made by School Director Julian Stolz, came at the end of a meeting that began with nearly 30 minutes of public comment by Willow Lane parents who came out to urge the board to reconsider its decision to eliminate busing for those Willow Lane students living within “walking distance” of the school.

Do you think the East Penn Board of School Directors should reconsider its decision to eliminate busing at Willow Lane? Tell us in the comments.

School Director Rebecca Heid made a motion to table Stolz’ motion before any discussion among the board occurred, stating that she would like to give the administration time to put together its plan for Willow Lane and present that plan to the board before making any decision on Stolz’ motion.

East Penn Superintendent of Schools Thomas L. Seidenberger assured Heid that that plan would be ready for the board at its next meeting, scheduled for Aug. 13.

Those taking the podium about Willow Lane last night focused on a common theme, questioning the board’s willingness to put the safety of elementary school students at risk in exchange for financial savings that equate to such a tiny percentage of East Penn’s $125 million budget.

They also repeatedly pointed out the seeming lack of a plan for how the new transportation scheme will be handled at Willow Lane.

Richard Muller of Macungie said that he didn’t think enough thought had been put into the decision about Willow Lane busing, asking if the traffic impact study being used to guide this decision was even conducted recently enough to be viable.

“There have been a lot of new developments in the area and the traffic counts are probably actually much higher,” said Muller, who described himself as a Willow Lane parent. “Yeah, you save $60,000 on busing, but you have no plan for how the kids are going to be managed, no plan to get the kids into the school.

“How are you going to get the 320 additional cars in and out of there?” he asked. “This just seems like a knee jerk reaction to cut $60,000. I ask that you take another look at it and really dive into the details before you make this decision.”

Mullers comments, like those of the half dozen others who addressed the board, were met with audience applause.

Willow Lane busing was cut as part of a 6-3 vote on June 25 that passed a 2012-2013 budget that will raise taxes in East Penn 1.3 percent.

Related Topics: Busing, East Penn School District, and Willow Lane Elementary School
Do you think the East Penn Board of School Directors should reconsider its decision to eliminate busing at Willow Lane? Tell us in the comments.

Vic

7:55 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

I believe the board needs to solely consider the childrens safety.We read more and more on people that want to give children rides as they walk to & from schools and even when children are out somewhere playing walking. I will say if the school board don,t let the busses pick up the children and take them back home the school board should sign an agreement that the school will be responsible for their safety walking to and from home to school and each board member that says no to the bussing of children should be held personaly liable for there safety and also sign an agreement to that affect also.

Reply

Michelle Bartolomei

8:14 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

I think it's ridiculous that "the plan" won't be ready for the Board to hear until August 13th ... only 14 days before school starts. Dr. Seidenberger and the whole entire school board are leaving parents hanging. This "plan" should have been laid out LONG before now, giving plenty time for everyone to review it PROPERLY, not in some rush before the first day of school. If Willow Lane was always intended to be a walking school, why is it only now that they are putting together a safety plan?! They've had 3 years to get this ready and roll it out ... but they're not going to present it until 2 weeks before school starts. This is the height of irresponsibility on their part.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Mariella Savidge

8:30 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Realities being what they are, Michelle, what do you think is the way to go from here?

Reply
Comment_arrow

tamarya

8:41 pm on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

I would say keep the buses at this point.

Emmaus Mom

9:53 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

I still don't understand why it's OK in everyone's mind for Lincoln and Jefferson kids to walk to school....many of them don't have "helicopter" parents who walk them to and from school everyday. They manage to walk to school in all types of weather and make it there safely. Seems like a double standard for the LM kids vs. the boro kids.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ron Beitler

10:28 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

@Emmaus mom I share this concern. A double standard would be very unfair. There are situations in the township where there are simply not safe routes and these need to be clearly addressed ASAP. But in general, if we ask borough residents to walk we should ask township residents who live within a reasonable distance to do the same.

Comment_arrow

Lower Mac Resident

11:25 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Walking to school is not the issue, it's the fact that it's not a SAFE walk for this particular school. Willow has over 700 students and is located on a busy straightaway - neither are conducive to a safe walking environment for students of that age.

Comment_arrow

careless fills

9:33 pm on Wednesday, July 11, 2012

would a curved road be safer than a "straightaway"?

Thomas

9:54 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

This is ridiculous. Not for the lack of planning, but the argument of no buses, so 320 cars are the solution? How about you walk? Safety? How about educating your children to not approach strangers. Seriously, it's within 1.5 miles. Or are your children fat? If not, they will be.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Really?

10:23 pm on Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Really Thomas? You have resorted to calling children "Fat"???? Amazing....like you are any better then the "fat" kids. Glad to see you have the children's best interest in mind.

Jayden

10:18 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

In the state of PA, schools are NOT required to provide transportation to students except for those with Disabilites. THIS IS THE LAW!! What happens when the bus company goes on strike? Remember what happened a few years ago? The bus company is a privately owned company and is NOT run by the school district. The school district pays First Student to provide the transportation as a convenience. They are not required to have public transportation. It was in the news not to long ago that the East Penn Superintendent of Schools wanted to cut all bus services because the state was cutting funds. "Seidenberger said that he knows parents will be upset to learn that the district would consider cutting student bus service down the road" http://emmaus.patch.com/articles/east-penn-may-look-at-cutting-student-buses-in-2013-2014

Reply

Ron Beitler

10:26 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

60,000 is the figure for willow lane. But you take the figure saved from ALL walking neighborhoods it's substantial. My only point of concern is creating a double standard between the boroughs and the townships. It's my understanding Emmaus, Alburtis and Macungie all have walkers. (Macungie did when I went to school)

I do agree however that this stuff should have been figured out quicker. It's my understanding many who live further out closer to the 1.5 range will receive exceptions. I haven't heard anything yet about how those exceptions would be granted and whats the protocol.

Reply

Michelle Bartolomei

10:35 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

It IS a safety issue, but it's not about educating children not to approach strangers -- mine know that full well, thank you very much. However, for Willow, almost all walking students would be crossing at least one busy road (2 of which have 4-way stop intersections that NO ONE knows how to negotiate), and then crossing 2 active, busy driveways and parking lots to just reach the building. We are talking busy roads and too many cars. Did you know that almost 400 children a year are killed walking to school? And did you know that the vast majority of those are killed by cars driven by parents driving *their* kids to school? Sorry ... I've already lived through the death of one of my children. I'm not risking the lives of the other two -- and certainly not because the school district couldn't get its act together over the course of THREE YEARS time. The lack of planning in this case IS ridiculous. THREE YEARS to put a plan in place and they've done nothing ... why is it now being done in the 11th hour? Their lack of planning in this case is unconscionable. If Willow is going to be a walking school, so be it. But, please, let's do it RIGHT. Not scrambling at the last minute. And not to save $60,000.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ron Beitler

10:48 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

@ Michelle, I don't mean to be callous but it's important to point out...
"NHTSA data indicate 8,000 children injured in school bus crashes annually. The American Academy of Pediatrics, however, reports that 17,000 children seek treatment in hospital emergency rooms due to school bus-related accidents. "

My point is simply this....there is danger for kids anytime they walk out the front door. . . This is a hot button issue. Parents are RIGHTLY concerned. But we have to see big picture.

I agree with you on the 4 way stop. The only acceptable solution is crossing guards. (My understanding these are already lined up). I'm on the record stating a signal will make this less safe. And again statistics, signals where they aren't needed (This intersection is only busy twice a day 4 of 24 hours a day) create a more dangerous situation for kids. It's a fact Red Light running is the #1 cause of accidents. A signal turns green and cars go, light is yellow people try to speed up.... People are trained to do so. With a crossing guard, the guard stays in the street until all children have cross. This is by far the safest solution and has been working for years in the boroughs.

Futher a signal will cost nearly a million dollars (source LMT 2010 traffic study)

I also 100% agree with you that the plan to put this all in place should be ready PRIOR to the vote. If the administration knew this was a possibility, then why wasnt this plan ready to go?

Comment_arrow

Ron Beitler

10:51 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

And again to be clear, your 100% right on being angry about perceived last minute-ness of getting out the action plan of this whole thing. If this was known (and it was) that this was going to be voted on and a possibility, this information should have been communicated to parents months ago. Everyone should have known Willow was to eventually go walking within X distance. But the actual safety and implementation plan should have been completed prior to the vote.

taxed-enough

11:12 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

From a previous news coverage and board meetings, it is my understanding that Wescosville has no walking students, Shoemaker has no walking students, Macungie has no walking students, and Alburtis has walking students, but they do not have to walk 1.5 miles (just a much shorter walking distance for Alburtis). Also, where are the areas in Emmaus that walk 1.5 miles? I am not aware of a street in Emmaus that currently walks 1.5 miles, but could anyone share which street in Emmaus walks 1.5 miles currently? Any additional information would be appreciated from the Patch or comments. There should be no double standard. We all pay taxes and elect school board members. If Emmaus would like bus service, there is certainly a way to get it through school board elections, and participating at school board meetings. Obviously, the majority of the school board wants to eliminate this transportation, and Julian Stolz is leading the fight for student safety, but he is outnumbered by the other votes on the board at this time.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ron Beitler

11:36 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

@TE - I might have been incorrect stating Macungie residents do. I know they used to... when I went to school (long time ago) I just emailed district asking for total number and which schools have walkers. I'm curious. Will post when I get response. I also just followed up with the furthest distance borough residents walk. FYI

Steve Miller

11:17 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Its awfully nice of them they cant find the 60k to bus our kids for their safety but they have a close door meeting to discuss raises for non union contracted employees meaning administration. Maybe they should make that meeting public and tell us as parents why they dont care about safety but care about adding money to their pockets.

Reply

Ron Beitler

11:30 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Just submitted a question regarding total number of walkers and what schools. I may have been incorrect saying that Alburtis and Macungie students walk. I was going off when I went to school. . . now this was over a decade ago (geesh I'm gettin old) - I'll post when I get this information.

Reply

Richard Gilbert

11:39 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

The other issue not mention, and a serious one, is the weight of the backpacks the children are carrying. As an adult I would not want to carry one of those for 1.5 miles. The children will develop back and shoulder problems, ask your pediatrician. Also, the lockers in school will not accomodate the roller type packs, so much for planning a walking school. Are the people making these decisions so consumed with $60K that they have lost all their common sense?

Reply

Richard Gilbert

12:19 pm on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Does anyone know if the $60K is a net figure? Have the wages for the crossing guards been factored in? If not, the savings will be smaller than $60K.

Reply

Ron Beitler

3:37 pm on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

@richard - in Emmaus it's volunteers. The borough pays for supplies (signs vests ect) 1000-1500

Reply

LMT parent

9:47 pm on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

If there are crossing guards and side walks, what is the problem???? I agree, the Lincoln, Jefferson, and some Alburtis Elementary kids walk. Teach your kids about street smarts, have the neighborhood kids walk together. The fact is, the neighborhoods you are talking about were shoemaker kids before they were willow lane and the shoemaker kids never had to walk....parents need to teach them how to stay on the sidewalk, not clown around, and listen to the crossing guards....geez....shouldn't be a safety issue if the kids learn how to navigate safely...it's a life skill. Extra cars dropping them off are a result of spoiled parents who don't want to walk their kids to school....no wonder kids are over weight. Parents be an example and teach your kids.

Reply
Comment_arrow

seriousthinking

9:22 am on Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Wow, I guess it is such a crime that the parents are genuinely concerned about the welfare of our children. Some people can not get passed the subject that our kids do not walk to school. Well there is so much more involved than just the "walking". We have every right to have a set plan in place already for our children to arrive to school safely. All the people on here whose kids go to Jefferson and other schools would be singing the same tune if their children walked but did not have a plan to keep them safe too. They may have "planned" on this school to be a walking school but they certainly did not design it to be. Now we will wait again until August, two weeks prior to school, to see what the new plans are for our children. And @ LMT parent...how do you know what us parents have taught our kids. My children know about strangers and what not to do. I dont see why you and others are so passionately concerned about how we raise our children and if we all choose to drive them its is our business NOT yours. Do you pay for our mortgages and gas for our cars?

Comment_arrow

LMTnative

11:51 am on Thursday, July 12, 2012

This is a double standard! The kids at Lincoln and Jefferson can walk to school. However the entitled folks near Willow think they are too good for it. Wake up people, you're not that special.

Faith Ziegler

7:58 pm on Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Other school & districts allow elementary students to walk 1.5 miles. As long as there are crossing guards at the intersections I see no problem with that. Kids need the exercise they are getting way to heavy for a healthy life.

Reply

Steve Godusky

9:25 pm on Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Good point Faith. Let the people whining about their poor children walking to school pay for the bus. Why should we all pay. My gut feeling is the school board will break down and give in to their whining. You know, grease the squeaky wheel.

Reply

Emmaus Mom

9:51 pm on Wednesday, July 11, 2012

I believe there are two crossing guards near Jefferson and a teacher posted in front of the building. Lincoln definitely has three and maybe four crossing guards. There is no "plan" for keeping the kids safe. They walk to school and cross a lot more streets than those manned by crossing guards. Have you ever driven down Harrison Street around 8:30am or 3:30pm? The kids are helped across the busy Harrison intersections by a VOLUNTEER crossing guard. They are on their own the rest of the way. Many kids walk from Colonial Crest apartments and are crossing 5-6-7 streets. And, yes, that includes the intersection of Harrison and Macungie...I don't hear their parents complaining.

Reply

careless fills

8:34 am on Thursday, July 12, 2012

Safety is paramount. Even Stolz recognizes this. The administration and the rest of the school board would be foolish not to come to the same conclsuion.

The only good that will come out of this little escapade is that when the next budget is developed, EPSD will discover that it will have pelenty of fund balance after spending $60,000 from the reserve, and in the process that it's taxpayers will have avoided an additional, unnecessary 0.04 mill increase!

Reply

Joyce12

11:40 am on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

One point that has not been made is that the difference between walking to Lincoln or Jefferson and walking to Willow Lane is sidewalks. I teach a class at Willow Lane in the early afternoon and I would not want to be walking on those roads. Drivers drive as though they are late for their last meal. There is a lot more traffic on all of the surrounding roads than you would think. Where would the kids walk safely?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ron Beitler

11:45 am on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

I've done a survey of walking paths. Including the bike paths along willow and saurkraut. Almost all the developments that have been listed can walk safely. Now there ARE exceptions. (willows lane into the village of East Texas, down Mill Creek Rd., Across Brookside.)

But the core surrounding Saurkraut and Willow is completely walkable. In fact safer then borough because bike paths are offset off the road an average of 10 foot.

NOW we NEED crossing guards and better cross walk paintings. And while I do not support a stop light at that intersection, I do support a flashing light crosswalk like is installed in Downtown Macungie. This + Human guards during school walking times.

Leave a comment