patching...
Breaking: Woman, 85, Struck by Vehicle and Killed: Coroner »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Taxpayers Paying More for Lawmakers’ Benefits

Health benefits and annual cost-of-living adjustment could total $6,000 per-member increase

 

By Jared Sichel | PA Independent

HARRISBURG — Pennsylvania taxpayers, who are struggling with tough economic decisions, will be paying House and Senate lawmakers more for their prescription and dental benefits this year.

And those same lawmakers also are expecting a salary increase in December just in time for the holidays.

The recently approved $27.656 billion budget includes $1.7 million, mostly for prescription and dental benefits with $1.4 million going to the House’s 203 members and $300,000 to the state Senate’s 50 members.

If lawmakers receive the cost-of-living increase, House and Senate members’ annual compensation, including salary and benefits, could increase by at least $6,000 per member, according to Senate Chief Clerk’s Office.

Last year, total compensation for all lawmakers’ salaries and medical benefits was about $32.3 million.

Eric Epstein, founder of Rock the Capital, a Harrisburg-based political watchdog group, said legislators are out of touch with voters.

The average Pennsylvania family does not get subsidized ‘Cadillac’ health care,” Epstein said. “Until these guys that govern us understand how hard it is to get by day to day, to pay health care, they’re not going to be able to pass legislation that improves the quality of life for Pennsylvanians.”

Lawmakers pay 1 percent of their salaries toward health benefits as opposed to their constituents who contribute 2 percent, according to data collected by the National Conference of State Legislators, a bipartisan organization that serves the legislators and staffs of the nation’s 50 states, and the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Base pay for legislators this year is more than $80,000, and lawmakers in leadership positions make more than $100,000.

Meanwhile, the median income for a Pennsylvania household is about $50,000, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

Erik Arneson, spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Dominic Pileggi, R-Chester, said Senate Republicans do “understand fully the difficult economic situation that Pennsylvania is in.”

“Much of our work this session has been targeted to improving the economic condition of our state,” Arneson said. “Increased health-care costs are an issue for every employer, whether in the private sector or the public sector.”

While some costs of the state’s full-time Legislature are going up, the money allocated to fund the state House and Senate was cut by about $800,000 in the recently approved budget. Last year, nearly $273 million helped pay for the Legislature’s operations.

The reduction is due to ongoing streamlining of other costs, primarily printing costs.

I think (printing and legislative expense accounts) have decreased considerably over the last three or four years,” said state Rep. Bill Adolph, R-Delaware.

Even though salaries comprise the bulk of lawmaker compensation, benefits — ranging from health and dental plans to per diems of $163 — increase how much House and Senate members make. 

Preferred provider organization health insurance plans for each of the 203 House members and their families cost taxpayers between $4,543 and $20,420 in fiscal 2011-12, according to the Bucks County Courier Times.

Most full-time House employees are enrolled in plans worth at least $6,855. Plans for each of the 50 state senators and their families range from $6,969 to $19,311.

While most lawmakers have health insurance plans worth at least $6,800, the average private-sector employee in Pennsylvania is enrolled in a plan worth about $5,000, according to 2010 data collected by NCSL.

Lawmakers have not once voted to increase their salaries since they repealed their own controversial pay raise in 2005, in which state lawmakers voted to increase their salaries from less than $70,000 to more than $81,000.

But benefit increases and COLAs have allowed House and Senate members to increase their compensation without facing a repeat of the voter anger politicians faced seven years ago.

Solely due to COLA increases, state lawmakers now make about $82,000 per year in salary.

COLAs adjust legislative salaries based on the Philadelphia region’s consumer price index. Any compensation increase in the upcoming budget would come on top of a 3 percent, or $2,500 salary increase that General Assembly members received in December 2011 as part of their annual COLAs.

State Sen. Mike Folmer, R-Lebanon, returns his COLA increases to the state Treasury and does not participate in the state’s pension system or the Legislature’s medical, prescription drug, or dental programs.

Folmer’s Chief of Staff Fred Sembach in an e-mail said that Folmer’s position is based on Article II, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution: “Health care for legislators is not provided for.”Medical and dental insurance contracts for this fiscal year will be available on the Treasury’s website in August.

 

Related Topics: Pennsylvania Health Care, Pennsylvania Lawmaker Benefits, and Pennsylvania Taxes

David Brugger

8:47 am on Sunday, July 8, 2012

One would have to consciously NOT be paying attention not to understand that ALL politicians take care of themselves at the expense of the average taxpayer. And if you think the PA state legislators are greedy, take a look at the tax-payer supported federal boys and girls with their generous pensions, salaries, healthcare benefits and illegal investment practices from confidential info they receive through their so-called jobs, which they work at for about 90 days a year. And if you think that there is a difference between the GOP and the Dems, you really are not paying attention.

Reply

Stew

8:51 am on Sunday, July 8, 2012

Mr. Justin Simmons is going to do what this year? Will he not accept any COLA as an increase in his salary (benefit) or will he be like all of the other politicians? Justin your actions will define your career.

Reply

Howard R.Bachman,Jr.

12:16 pm on Sunday, July 8, 2012

THESE BUMS ARE GETTING MORE OF OUR MONEY THAN WE ARE TO LIVE ON--THE BUMS SAY WE HAVE TO LIVE WITHIN OUR MEANS--WEL !!-OUR MEANS ARE GETTING SMALLER AND SMALLER WHILE THESE BUMS ARE GETTING RICHER OFF US AND WE CAN'T AFORD TO GET GOOD HEALTH CARE OR ENJOY OUR LIFES WHEN RETIRED--THEY JUST KEEP PICKING OUR POCKETS-THANKS ALOT YOU BUMS !!!!

Reply

Patti

12:38 pm on Sunday, July 8, 2012

I think it is very interesting that our representatives are getting a COLA, yet cutting funds to the needy. Also, Harrisburg has been attacking teachers for "all the money" they make, but many have chosen, through their unions, not to take raises to help their districts.
Maybe they should think before they vote their self-interest. Who out there is getting a $6000 raise?

Reply

Proud2BParkland

12:59 pm on Sunday, July 8, 2012

Agreed Patti. They cut funding to children in public schools because they cannot vote, harming the youngest members of society and their hardworking parents.

Reply

Patriot2

3:20 pm on Sunday, July 8, 2012

What kind of health care plans cost $7000 per year for individuals to $19000 for families? Plans I am aware of cost about $5000 for employees to $14000 for families. These must be truly cadillac type plans that are clearly not consistent with the private company plans of their constituents. Also normal for most company plans to ask employees to pay about 25%-40% of the cost for their insurance.

Reply

Sheila DuPree

3:50 pm on Sunday, July 8, 2012

I get so tired of hearing that legislators do not work hard, and David Brugger stated....only work 90 days out of the year. Really? Clearly, you do not know what you are talking about. These lawmakers from the LV get up early to drive to H'burg and often come home after the sky turns dark. Most have families that just don't see them very much. Even though they may be in H'burg, they are still in constant contact with their staff in the LV to ensure the constituents are being cared for. Know what you are talking about before you speak, please!

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Brugger

4:10 pm on Sunday, July 8, 2012

Shella: 1st, I was referring to the US Congress if you had read my statement.
2nd: Here is a cite of how to define work days by the Congress. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20126778-503544/house-plans-only-109-workdays-in-2012/ Sorry I was off by 19 days this year.
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor released the 2012 House calendar today, and lawmakers will be spending even less time in Washington next year than they did this year. There are just six scheduled working days in January. Three in August. And five in October. In all, the House of Representatives is scheduled to be in session 109 weekdays next year, and will be in recess 151 weekdays - meaning recess days will outstrip working days by nearly a 3 to 2 margin.
"Six days on the calendar in January? It really makes you wonder about the schedule," remarked House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi at her weekly press conference, adding that "particularly at this time when American people are feeling so much pain...at some point you have bring the message home and represent your people, find agreement, we can't do that if everyone is at home."
Republicans shot back that Democrats scheduled even fewer work days - 104 - in 2008.

Comment_arrow

Harrison T Williamson, Jr.

4:25 pm on Sunday, July 8, 2012

get to drive taxpayer paid for cars, with taxpayer paid for gasoline and tolls, and lets take Doug Reichley who had a bachelor pad blocks from the state capital , more and more legislatures live part time in harrisburg, you really think a rep from erie commutes everyday?

Good pay
Free Cars
Free Meals
Free Lifetime Healthcare
Excellent Pension
Long Vacations

Comment_arrow

SWT Resident

8:15 am on Monday, July 9, 2012

Shelia....which elected official do you work for again that you would so voraciously defend a known problem???

Ronald Weaver

4:12 pm on Sunday, July 8, 2012

Alot of people work hard, thats hardly an argument. Why should they get much much higher retirement benefits then the private sector. Many don't don't receive any Company paid retirement. Do you know how many years most Government workers have to work to get FULL retirement? Another good example of why we need less Government, like hiring thousands more IRS agents, just the tip of the iceberg. Like a cancer that you can't cure.

Reply

Dana Grubb

7:14 am on Monday, July 9, 2012

The inequity between what public elected officials choose to pay themselves (pay and benefits) versus what the real world electorate earns at their places of employment is real. Many elected to represent "we the people" often tend to forget who put them in their positions of authority in the first place.

When they cut programs that return real benefits to various classes of voters, such as the poor and the medically needy, etc., and still take care of themselves, they've lost all touch with reality and should be removed from office the next time that they are running for that office.

They don't deserve our support!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Patrice Sidoione All That Salon

1:26 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012

I think they are operating from their reality! The problem is not that they do not know...IT IS THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND OR CARE...a combination of both! We have become a nation of people that has again vilified the poor, almost criminal to be poor or working class like we are substandard and negligible! Definitely not considered necessary!
So what do we do to make them loose their jobs??? Not that I think they should be jobs but rather public service...Maybe if they had to really work for a living in the communities they decimate they would have a different tact!

SWT Resident

8:14 am on Monday, July 9, 2012

I can't add a single thing more than my fellow taxpayers have stated here. Over the years our elected officials have set themselves up pretty fat and happy...at our expense...no matter how the taxpayers suffer to keep their heads above water. Although I am nearing the end of my time under the 'rule' of these people, I truly fear for the youngsters who have yet to establish themselves with an affordable education. a liveable job, a roof over their head. and a family. The United States ruling authorities are certainly not safe from overthrow...not by any means. Exactly what is happening in far off nations with civil unrest...can and will happen here in its own time. When? When enough of the 99% has said...enough! Our means of election has become a joke...a slap in the peoples faces. It does nothing but put some other scumbag in office. Those elected have set the requirements so high as to try and even get on the ballot and challenge an incumbent, they have assured themselves a spot on the taxpayer teet...for life. WE have a serious, serious forthcoming problem in this nation.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

1:21 pm on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

SWT
You are right on the money. WE have allowed officials to set themselves up in short order to the poin that it is difficult to defeat them at the state and federal level. But we must do it. Here again the "Term limits" amendment must be put in place other wise we will be looking at a tyrannical government that we put in office
Chris Miller

Patrice Sidoione All That Salon

10:08 am on Monday, July 9, 2012

They may know in theory what is going on economically for people in PA BUT with their salaries, benefits & unaccountability they have no understanding from personal experience what is it like...I as one PA resisdent lost my home, business location & apartments, which for me was my pension fund, to a project created by a PA Senator's law with no consideration as to how that law would affect individuals since it involved the employment of Eminent Domain to take if we did not sell!!!
So to hear about them having cadillac health insurance policies & what about the retirees health coverage & former reps???? Is beyond swallowing...
I am for these positions to STOP being jobs & become something like JURY DUTY! Let's have paid educated government employees & have citizens come in for 2-4 years stints to bring the voice of the people into the mix...BUT this is nutz...these people do not have to make a living in their areas, weld power & receive favors (too many to name), and do not have a transparency or accountability responsibility...People say vote them out...really...HOW ABOUT don't let Frankenstine roost!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Brugger

11:47 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

I have been proposing this for years. My solution is to use registered voters rolls, randomly choose from each US district,one person who will serve for 5 years at good pay and benefits. There can be no lobbying or acceptance of any gifts to any so chosen representative. Each person will serve for this one term and can never again be a representative. They can only pass laws that affect everyone int he country, that is, no especial legislation or appropriations for any specific district or group. It will be considered your patriotic duty as a citizen to serve with consideration for those who are simply unable to serve. The U.S. certainly could not do any worse than what we have now.

Patrice Sidoione All That Salon

10:16 am on Monday, July 9, 2012

I want to simply share with you something said by Travis Smiley about budgets..."They are moral documents"...That begs the question what do our budgets say about our morals, values, humanity???
From what I have seen from federal on down I am ashamed of the choices made & outraged that I am asked to accept unacceptable!

Reply

SWT Resident

10:51 am on Monday, July 9, 2012

The problem isn't so much the individual. It is the institution. What started out many years ago as a representative of the people's work fell to corruption and greed. The original terms of serving as a people's elected representative were bent, curved, beat, and realigned into a well paying exclusive taxpayer funded job. This is way off course from what the designers of our Commonwealth Constitution had in mind. There is only one cure: Commonwealth Constitution. Change the rules back to where they belong. And there are only two ways for that to happen: our elected officials put forth a Convention. Or our Governor puts forth a Convention. Remember what the original terms of serving as a people's elected representative say for compensation: a fair wage and mileage reimbursement. Nothing about per diems, health care, pensions, cars, etc. That was all added later by the greed. In seeing Senator Pat Browne almost jam an NIZ down out throats basically scuttling our township budgets forcing a local tax increase so Allentown would get the money out of us one way or another for their fantasy arena...this goes to show you today the power and abuse that comes with office as well as what happens when an elected official gives a crap less about his constituents. He thought he was untouchable. Well his plan failed and so too will Pat Browne in the next election. He should be the #1 target on EVERY voters list.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Patrice Sidoione All That Salon

1:18 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012

SWT would you explain this convention more? Plus I would like to understand is it now law to provide for the rats or not? Based on what you mentioned the PA Constitution does not provide for what they are getting??? So Could it be unadded???
Pat Brown's law was stacked to have one & one place qualify...how is that lawful??? I have personally never been in such close proxsimity to unadulterated greed I found it shocking & unsettling! The comment that too the cake was that his second wife, his former secratery, is the lobbyist for the arena & that was not connected to his writing the legislation! A coinsodence from what I read...I found that remark insulting & dismissive!
How do we make his removal a target??? How does this type of thing get exposed when so many people with money power cover up & negate what is actually happening?
I for one am willing to work WORK at exposing this type of disregard & self seving harlotry...certainly it must be stopped or we are going to colapse as a middle class or even working poor...I have no desire to be a Molly McGuire slave to corporate control!
Finally, I think the institution is more like a tv set... neutral, inatimate! THE PROGRAMING is the problem & the programing is done by human beings! And these human beings are not even to the calibur of prostitutes as that would be a fair exchange...They are simply self serving takers aka harlots!

louis kootsares

11:25 am on Monday, July 9, 2012

it appears that our elected officials have their own agenda it unifies them party does not matter they will agree and do the best thing.. no not for us for them

Reply

Leave a comment