patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Is Streaking Just a Harmless Prank?

The Emmaus streaker's peers are regarding him a hero and most grown-ups seem to think his stunt was kind of funny. Take our poll and let us know what you think.

 

 

An Emmaus teen who ran naked onto the field during Friday night’s Emmaus High School football game at Bethlehem Area School District Stadium became an overnight social media sensation. Peers immediately jumped on Twitter, setting the streaker up as a hero and calling for his liberation.

The 17-year-old boy was arrested for his stunt and will face his day in Northampton County Juvenile Court.

Most who commented on yesterday’s Patch story about the streaker had a “boys will be boys” attitude and termed the incident a simple “prank.”

However, one very vocal Patch commenter who goes by the name “D. Nile,” found nothing amusing about the 17-year-old’s stunt.

“Children exposing themselves nude in public is not funny...and people snapping pictures and posting them on the internet is even less funny,” D. Nile wrote.

Now we want to know what you think. Take our poll and share your thoughts in the comments.

  • Is streaking just a harmless prank?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes. Boys will be boys. Everyone needs to relax.
        19 (63%)
    • No. There is nothing funny about underage children running around naked in public.
        10 (33%)
    • Other. Elaborate on your answer in the comments.
        1 (3%)
    Total votes: 30
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: East Penn School District, Emmaus High School, Football, Freedom High School, Streaking, and bethlehem

Chandler

8:31 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Boys will be boys--but not all will do something like this. It's a selfish "look at me" act. His moment of fame and it shows rebelliousness. What other stuff does this young man do--and what will be next? I would personally be embarrassed for him if he were my son--not for myself--but for him.

Reply

Stan Zukowski

9:25 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

You mean... a teenager doing a selfish "look at me" act? Shocking!

Conversation heard around 10,000 BC:

Ugga the Cavewoman: "Your son. He run naked through village. He bad! Become serial killer! Society falls! Doom! Despair!"

Ugg the Caveman: "Thassa mah boy!"

Reply

An interested bystander

9:27 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Idiotic, childish, etc. And a completely harmless prank.

Kids laughed (and most adults), in the end he takes his punishment and we all move on.

Reply

Brian Tallarico

9:50 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

"The children now love luxury; they have bad manners, contempt for
authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place
of exercise. Children are now tyrants, not the servants of their
households. They no longer rise when elders enter the room. They
contradict their parents, chatter before company, gobble up dainties
at the table, cross their legs, and tyrannize their teachers.
Attributed to SOCRATES by Plato.

Reply

Wendy Ross

10:04 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Big Deal. Raise your (virtual) hand if you never rebelled. Half of those who don't raise their hands have selective memories and I feel pity for the other half. Go for it. Do things. Have fun. No one got hurt. Yep, big deal.

Reply

Nancy Steele

10:28 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

It gives a lot of attention and notice to teens for the wrong thing. Better to admire and remember the athletes who worked hard in a disciplined way to compete fairly. Just what is it we value in our society?
N. Steele

Reply

tamarya

10:57 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Why would this be funny, basically 17 your body is an adult body and someone is now running around exposing their nude self to small children possibly. Ones that think it is funny obviously would have no problem with a grown man pulling their pants down in front of their toddler or young child. Disgusting!

Reply
Comment_arrow

An interested bystander

2:40 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

classic case of blowing it out of proportion.

Comment_arrow

tamarya

4:03 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

No it is a classic case of East Penn parents showing their perfection until one of their young do wrong then they want it brushed under the carpet and ignored. But man you east penn parents show no problem arguing the school corrupting your little angels minds.

Comment_arrow

An interested bystander

4:28 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Tamarya, What part of "....he takes his punishment...." in my earlier comment did you miss?

Comment_arrow

tamarya

9:47 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Okay so we agree he should see punishment, what I am getting at is this is a school game where possibly families of the players had younger children that now saw this kid run acrossed the field. There is no reason a family of a player should not be able to bring small kids if they have any to a game their older child plays in because someone may run nude acrossed the field. If the question was " should streaking be acceptable in bars" then fine, most people are drunk there and it is adults, not a family event.

Wendy Ross

11:02 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

A man who corners a child to expose himself is a sick man. At the same time, something like this is not sexual. Correlating nudity with sex is part of what swrong with this country. Nudity is natural, but everything is so sexualized! The more things you make tabboo, the more they end up being perverted.

Reply
Comment_arrow

tamarya

11:07 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

I am sorry but I would have not wanted my kids at 3 or 4 yrs old seeing some 17 yr old's penis. Also they are worried about sex offenders on computers however people find this acceptable. I guess age plays a role in todays world, you can be a disgusting human until you are considered an adult by law. Hurt people all you want till you are an adult, screw the kids even younger than you till you turn 18. Like I said disgusting nation we live in.

Comment_arrow

tamarya

11:09 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

And I would have no pity for this person shall his picture wound up on the wrong type of site, I cannot feel sorry for a high school teen being stupid, then told what he did was ok and funny.

Wendy Ross

11:12 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Well, I guess we agree to disagree. I find the world is far too uptight and focuses on minutia instead of the truly horrendous things going on in the wold.

Reply
Comment_arrow

tamarya

11:21 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

I mean I know I did stupid things as a teen however I faced consequences with the stuff I did. I didn't expose myself and I was never taught the stuff I did was acceptable. I was told right out if what I did was foolish and stupid and unacceptable. And being taught that is what got me to straighten out before I was an adult, and my screw ups were basically when I was 14 and 15.

Cherie Grandizio

12:28 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Ironic how people appoint themselves Judge & Jury of others - never "as bad" as the accused, when it is really just a matter of sinning differently. You say yourself Tamarya that you did stupid things, but...........
Wendy, agree with all of your posts...we are realists!

Reply
Comment_arrow

tamarya

12:31 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

I also added I did stupid stuff with punishment, you are saying we should ignore this and act as if it is acceptable. If kids want to be stupid then pay the consequences.

Comment_arrow

tamarya

12:34 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

The article clearly states " Is streaking a hamrless prank", which is something you ignore when it occurs. And nowhere in the article do I see any type of consequences for this kid, it is more do they find it acceptable or is it inacceptable of kids exposing themselves. In otherwords if an adult ran in public streaking their would be jail or charges.

tamarya

12:41 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Nevermind he was arrested so this is basically asking if he should be let go and not arrested, so I will answer that, yes he should be charged, if you want to be stupid face the consequences.

Reply

tamarya

12:45 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

And also people find this hilarious but god forbid do not let a lady breastfeed her baby in public. As the ones that find this funny, what goes around comes around, so maybe some adult will run nude through your yard, or maybe we will read this teens picture made its way to a porn site. Then I bet your attitudes will change.

Reply

Cherie Grandizio

1:03 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Please lighten up Tamarya - Okay, you paid some obviously pretty harsh consequences for your teenage 'bad acts', seriously though, no matter how you want to spin it, there is no comparison between this prank & the truly criminal, vicious act of a 19 yr. old smashing a 62 yr. old woman's head into a car (see article in The Patch today)
I won't even speculate why you consider a 'streaker' on par with a pedophile, only you know that story. For myself, I am putting an Amen to all this pettiness. Bye....

Reply
Comment_arrow

tamarya

1:12 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

I am not done. How can parents of the same district that wanted a book banned because of content find a nude kid at a football game with possible young children acceptable. Now wait maybe this kid read too much Prep and that is where he came up with this idea.

Comment_arrow

tamarya

1:19 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

I guess though unless it would involve a 17 yr old exposing themselves to my kids that are now 8 and 9 I really have no say. If my kids would be involved then I could be in an uproar all I want, and as for if my kids would do this and I want them charged that is up to me.

Comment_arrow

An interested bystander

2:52 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

A 17yr old didn't walk up to your kids and expose themselves. A kid ran across the field naked, got caught, and will pay his dues.

This is not pedophilia, and your attempt to equate it as such is just ridiculous.

Brian Tallarico

4:48 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Here's another one:
"I see no hope for the future of our people if they are dependent on
frivolous youth of today, for certainly all youth are reckless beyond
words... When I was young, we were taught to be discreet and
respectful of elders, but the present youth are exceedingly wise
[disrespectful] and impatient of restraint" (Hesiod, 8th century BC).

Reply

Melody

10:42 am on Friday, September 28, 2012

Omg Tamayra you really need to stop it was a prank and harmless. You really are uptight. Do you put your children in a bubble. Did you ever think of just talking to your children, telling them that what the boy did is wrong and explain. This is how children learn . That's what's wrong with our kids today parents shield and do everything for their kids. This is the real world .it has been done many a times and I'm sure will be done again. It is parents job to teach our children not society.

Reply
Comment_arrow

tamarya

4:15 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

Same for you too, so I can get naked in front of your kids since nudity is natural? Stupid people in east penn I must say.

Comment_arrow

tamarya

4:16 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

All I got to say is for some of you, if your kids get exposed to porn on the computer or to pedophiles it is no wonder why.

Haley

11:10 am on Friday, September 28, 2012

Yea tams on a power trip lol....but seriously I think society is uptight and some people on this board too. If you have kids and they ever took a bath time photo or your babies first bath like some have years before us that's now considered child porn. Some agree some disagree but walmart will report you I heard of. A boy running how many yards away is hardly exposing himself if you can't make out details compared to someone who is in front if you flashing someone. Harmless prank yea but the law is the law so he does have to face his actions.

Reply

ron

12:37 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

Yes there are a lot worse things than some punk running across a football field naked. The problem is these kids that show no respect to others sometimes grow up and become adults that show no respect to others. Then when they hurt someone we all as a society have to pay the price. So while this was far from the worst thing in the world it was also not just a silly funny prank. The first thing i thought when i saw him run across the field was what a looser but i hope im wrong. I hope he grows up and i wish him well.

Reply

ron

1:01 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

I wonder what the people that think it was funny and silly and harmless would be saying if the boy or the officers would have been injured during the pursuit or when they had to pull him off the top of the fence and subdue him.

Reply

Haley

1:20 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

The USA was always uptight with nudity or the human body compared to other nations and Europe. Look at soccer or tennis and you always see news about a streaker during those matches with the British police running after them. Stupid I know and sorta funny depending on your humor but they are used to it and it doesn't shock them. In the old days I heard parents used to let there kiss run around naked when they were babies and now we are uptight yet starting to push the boundaries on tv and media as is. Who knows what will shock us 5 years from now

Reply
Comment_arrow

ron

1:33 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

I agree totally people are way to uptight with nudity. it didnt bother me that he was naked. what bothered me was the disrespect and the fact that he could have injured himself or someone else.

Haley

1:49 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

Yea I mean you go to Germany and Europe and nudity is art there even in the streets ppl paint or get photographed. I'm not saying kids should be exposed to it but look at how kids are over there drinking at a young age and how open society is there. There work ethic is better and less drunk drivers and roads maintained. Maybe we should be as open!

Reply
Comment_arrow

ron

2:28 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

Its hard for people to get over their insecurities i guess and it's easier to blame some problems on things like nudity instead of looking for the real cause.

Comment_arrow

tamarya

4:14 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

And you wrong do you mean you would not care if I would undress myself in front of your children?

momof4

3:09 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

I agree w/Tamarya. What about the people who had young kids there or young pre teen girls there, technically he could be charged with exposing himself to children and he should be. You would think he would have better judgement at that age. And as someone else said if he would have been hurt they would most likely be looking to sue someone :(

Reply
Comment_arrow

tamarya

4:13 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

Someone with a brain finally. What I do not understand is these people are finding it acceptable for a kid with basically an adult body running across the field where small kids could be in those stands, however these are the same parents that are fighting a book because of it's words getting into the hands of 15 and 16 yr olds. Sounds hypocritic to me. Good thing my kids no longer attend east penn, and the kids in this district have some morals and self respect at least. Like I said if adults want to run around a bar nude and expose themselves to adults then so be it, however don't do where kids could be, meaning young kids. And also was this not the district that had a teens picture put on a porn site or was that parkland? That is another thing these people seem to fail to forget and I bet these same ones would be saying how sick individuals are if it winds up on one.

Comment_arrow

Beth

11:33 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Leave the poor kid alone. That's the problem these days. EVERYTHING is made to be such a big deal. If you aren't comfortable explaining to your young kids why someone would do something silly like that, then keep them in a bubble-there are plenty of adults that do stupid things everyday of their lives-in front of their children too. And, it is not the same as being in a private room with an adult undressing in front of a child. No school district is immune to kids doing things like this, or posting naked pictures of themselves, or getting pregnant in high school, or drinking underage-the list goes on. And, to judge an entire school district for one or two acts from a couple of it's students-is just narrow minded. It wasn't the school district that did anything-it was the kid.

D

8:26 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

Were any of you leaving comments at the game? If you were, then you would have laughed your ass off! If you didn't laugh, then you must be one of those old stiff boring people that are the brunt if jokes in most movies!! Do you ever wonder why you have no friends?? It's because you're boring and have no common sense. The very same people that are prosecuting this poor kid were streaking back in the 70's themselves. Trust me, your little angels have seen much worse on their cell phones/PC's that YOU provided them. Maybe they should arrest you because you're half the problem. Don't you remember when you were young? Oh, maybe you were one if those kids that were picked on and casted out. Thank GOD you went to therapy and now getting back to society. Oh I forgot...we can't say GOD anymore. We might offend simeone. Get a life!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

tamarya

8:32 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

My kids do not have a cell phone, and you are right if I provide them with porn they would arrest me. No questions asked there, I would be in jail. Same way if I would undress myself and run somewhere I would be in jail also. Same way if you streak you would be in prison too. Just because this person is 17 does not mean I feel he should be free. I am not one of those people that baby people who do wrong because of age. If it were my kids doing an act like that I would beg police to cuff them, only way you will learn is you pay the price. Oh yeah and just so you know we are not in the 70's anymore, if we were in the 70's my kids wouldn't have needed carseats till they were 8 and if they back talked me I could smack them in the mouth in public without a child abuse charge.

D

8:44 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

So sounds like you have already thought of being handcuffed. That's a different thing. Our society is full of people who are reading "50 shades of gray". Let's just says we may not like everything kids do. We've all been there and survived. Someday it will be a funny memory of his high school days. I'm sure there were a few things you weren't proud of. But.. You still had a good time. It was funny, period. Appropriate , probably not. Life goes on. Take an Advil. You sound stressed.

Reply
Comment_arrow

tamarya

9:04 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

Lets just say 2 things I did were not funny memories, one thing got me put into lehigh valley's adoloescent unit for 2 weeks, another thing landed me going through something I hope no women would ever have 2 live through. So no my screw ups turned into a lesson learned and nothing funny about them. Yes maybe if we lived in the old times when no one really had consequences then we could all have fun, like in the 70's and 80's there were no such thing as pedophiles, teenagers screwed adults, parents smoked and drank around their children, you could do whatever you wanted, not anymore.

Comment_arrow

tamarya

9:08 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

Maybe thats why I am so uptight too my memories were bad ones, or I should say my stupidity, and also you change too mostly when you become a parent, now you would have asked my if this was funny before I became a mom and was in my late teens and early 20's then it might have been different. However some people mature with age and do not find things humerous anymore.

D

9:17 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

You're right. Sometimes when we get older we forget to laugh. It's good for the soul.
Enough said.

Reply

Haley

9:17 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

Society as a whole is messed up...18 to be an adult pose nude, 21 to drink and gamble, 16 is the legal age you can have sex with someone over 18 and up..nothing really makes any sense anymore and noone really follows the rules, like that website in question, it's still up and kids still are posting stuff on that so obviously something needs to change in the world.

Reply

Haley

9:19 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

Best yet are those ppl who get to post bail after a horrible crime and walk free yet we lock up ppl for lesser crimes. I rather have a child molester locked up then some kid who got caught with pot.

Reply

Leave a comment