Animal Cruelty Charged in Upper Milford
Police say owner did not get dog veterinary care.
An Upper Milford Township man has been charged with animal cruelty for not getting veterinary care for a large growth around his dog's mouth, according to police.
Adam R. Plumley, 32, of 5145 Spruce Road was charged Aug. 2 with not seeking proper care for his mastiff, according to state police at Fogelsville. Police said the incident was reported on that date, but did not provide the circumstances.
They said the dog was relinquished to a mastiff rescue organization.
Charges were filed with Magisterial District Judge Donna Butler of Emmaus.
Barb
8:14 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
people if you can't afford to care totally for an Animal don't get one, this goes for food , Love, and vet care!
Sara
8:22 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Sometimes it's not that easy. I bought a dog with mutiple health problems and we have spent a lot of money ($1000+) since we got her in April. Sometimes vet bills can be too much and more than you expected. I'm not saying let the dog suffer, but what should you do if you run out of money? I expected to care for the dog and spend money on her, but I didn't expect that much in such a short period of time.
Edwin Feuerstein, Jr.
12:03 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Barb,
If people realistically used that criteria to own a pet, there would be an awful lot of pets that never got a home. Most people have no idea how expensive a dog or cat or other animal can be. We spent over $1000 trying to save our dog in the early 1990's and lost her. I can't imagine what that operation would have cost now. As our pets died we didn't replace them because they became as expensive as caring for a person. Vets like human medical care have gotten too expensive to use. We will never own another animal because the cost is prohibitive for anyone with less income than Obama and Romney.
An interested bystander
8:57 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Sara, I don't think Barb's comment was directed at people like you, trying to do the right thing.
Sara
12:40 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
I know, but what I'm saying is, what if you run out of money? What if this person just lost their job? We don't know their situation.
tamarya
11:40 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
I love animals however, do we not find it strange that this owner got charged because he could not afford a few thousand dollars to get a growth removed, however a teenager and another person intentionally dragged their puppies on the back of a pick up and they got their dogs back. If anything they should be offering help instead of arresting, but then why would they when even animal care is all about money. At least the guy did not take the dog and euthanize it like some would.
Edwin Feuerstein, Jr.
10:50 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Another example of "do gooders" going over board. Is the growth threatening the life of the dog? Is the growth painful? Is it unsightly to those that look at the dog? What is the reason for this charge? Would you rather the owners drop the dog off in the woods and abandon it somewhere or lovingly care for it as best they can?
"Big Brother" is alive and well in Upper Milford Township.
AnnaMarie Zeravsky
12:01 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
I purchased 2 dogs 5 years ago, knowing that 2 dogs come along with huge expenses. Between food, grooming, annual vet care, flea and tick prevention, the cost adds up quickly. But Jacob has skin allergies which require expensive food and medication to prevent him from licking/scratching. And despite applying flea/tick preventatives every month, he still ended up with Lyme disease. Jazmine on the other hand, seemed well until she was 3 years old and the stench from her mouth was getting increasingly foul. We then learned that she had a huge growth in her mouth/jaw area. She needed surgery to remove this growth which in total cost us about $3,500. She also lost a few teeth as a result and now requires expensive soft food because she cannot chew hard food. Two years later, her growth is coming back. It causes her no pain, just fowl breath. We have decided not to do another surgery mainly because of financial reasons. We have spent well over $10,000 on medical issues for 2 dogs over 5 years which does not include regular 'maintenance". So because I am electing not to get surgery does that mean I should be charged with animal cruelty? I feed my dogs every day, give them their medication, make sure they get enough exercise, get them groomed and most importantly LOVE THEM LIKE FAMILY! It is a shame that vet care is so expensive...maybe more people would take their animals to the vet if the care wasn't so astronomical!
tamarya
3:04 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012
I agree, even with our own children if something unexpected happens we cannot pull thousands of dollars out our rear for medical care. Big difference is there is insurance for humans. Yes there is insurance for pets but it only pays a very tiny amount, basically good for routine check ups and shots, and maybe small testing like bloodwork or xrays. Even for people look how many children and adults have dental problems because of outragous dental expenses, and that insurance also covers basically nothing either.